Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v M101 Nominees Pty Ltd, in the matter of M101 Nominees Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1166 File number(s): VID 524 of 2020
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – investigation by ASIC – ex parte application – ASIC seeks appointment of provisional liquidator, asset preservation orders, restraining orders and travel restriction orders – whether orders should be made on ex parte basis – whether orders necessary and appropriate in the particular circumstances – risk of potential fraudulent dissipation of assets – risk conduct has characteristics of a "Ponzi scheme" Held: orders sought are necessary and appropriate on the basis of evidence presented
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 472(2), 1101B(1), 1101B(5), 1323(1), 1323(3), 1324(1) and 1324(4) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 23
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2001) 38 ACSR 266 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 1180 Australian Securities and Investments Commission, In the Matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 099 071 968) v Carey (No 3) [2006] FCA 433 Australian Securities & Investments Commission; in the Matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd ACN (099 071 968) v Carey (No 19) [2008] FCA 38 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd, in the matter of CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 545 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Financial Circle Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 2 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Goldenberg [2020] FCA 809 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Hawley [2008] FCA 1423 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Koops [2010] FCA 20 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Linchpin Capital Group Ltd [2018] FCA 1104 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mauer-Swisse Securities Ltd [2002] NSWSC 684 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mauer-Swisse Securities Ltd [2002] NSWSC 741 Australian Securities & Investments Commission, in the matter of Money for Living (Aust) Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) v Money for Living (Aust) Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2005] FCA 1621 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Secure Investments Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 639 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Troy (1999) 33 ACSR 121 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wealth & Risk Management Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 477 Carr v Darren Berry International Marine Pty Ltd (No. 1) [2013] FCA 1150 Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Lombard Nash International Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 11 ACLR 566 Deputy Commissioner v Ausmart Services Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1912 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v A & S Services Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 437
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate