Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Vitamin Co Pty Ltd v Healthy Hab Pty Ltd (Discovery) [2020] FCA 1194 File number: NSD 1021 of 2019
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 20 August 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – where Applicant's list of documents not in accordance with categories ordered under Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.17(3)(a) – whether order for particular discovery should be made
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) (repealed) O 15 r 8 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.23, 20.16, 20.17, 20.21 High Court Rules 1952 (Cth) (repealed) O 32 r 18
Cases cited: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Rio Tinto Coal Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 462; 232 FCR 560 In the matter of Vitamin Co Pty Ltd (ACN 614 680 367) [2019] VSC 540 Metcash Trading Limited v Bunn [2010] FCA 8; 263 ALR 132 Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of hearing: 9 July 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: J Sleight
Solicitor for the Applicant: Neville & Hourn Legal
Counsel for the Respondents: E Young
Solicitor for the Respondents: Comlaw Barristers & Solicitors
ORDERS NSD 1021 of 2019
BETWEEN: VITAMIN CO PTY LTD Applicant
AND: HEALTHY HAB PTY LTD First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate