Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Gadzikwa v Comcare [2020] FCA 1205 File number: VID 260 of 2020
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2020
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – objection to competency of appeal – interlocutory decision of the Tribunal to refuse to issue summonses – whether interlocutory decision of a Tribunal a "decision" for purposes of ss 43 and 44(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – application dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 39, 43, 44(1), 44(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.30 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 14, 62(3)
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170; [1981] HCA 39 Director General of Social Services v Chaney (1980) 47 FLR 80 Douglass v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2017] FCA 1105 Mladenov v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 1472 MDXJ v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 2163 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998)193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Phillips v Inspector General in Bankruptcy [2011] FCA 612 Yao v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2010] FCA 18
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate