Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Energy City Qatar Holding Company v Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1219 File number: NSD 94 of 2020
Judgment of: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – where applicant seeks pre-judgment interest – where arbitration award did not allow for interest – no pre-judgment interest awarded – where applicant seeks third party costs order against directors of respondent – where respondent is allegedly a company of straw – where respondent company had bona fide grounds to defend claim – no third party costs awarded – usual order as to costs ordered
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43(2), 51A International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 8(3), 8(5)
Cases cited: Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 10) [2009] FCA 498 Energy City Qatar Holding Company v Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1116 Kebaro Pty Ltd v Saunders [2003] FCAFC 5 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd [1992] HCA 28; 174 CLR 178 Taylor v Pace Developments Ltd [1991] BCC 406 Vanguard 2017 Pty Limited, in the matter of Modena Properties Pty Limited v Modena Properties Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1461 Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (No 2) (1997) 147 ALR 685
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: International Commercial Arbitration
Number of paragraphs: 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate