Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (No 5) [2020] FCA 1243 File number: NSD 200 of 2019
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for removal of proceeding from docket of Docket Judge on the ground of apprehended bias – patent infringement proceeding – patent revocation proceeding – where previous proceeding and current proceeding involve related patent specifications containing identical text – where in previous proceeding Docket Judge made findings on the meaning of terms used in patent specification – where in the present proceeding the same terms are used in the specifications in suit – where in previous proceeding Docket Judge made findings with respect to disclosures in priority documents to determine priority date of claims – where in the present proceeding the same priority documents are to be construed to determine the priority dates of the claims in suit – whether a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that Docket Judge might not bring an impartial mind to the adjudication of the same issues in the present proceeding
Cases cited: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Globaltech Corporation Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 811 British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; 242 CLR 283 Charan v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCAFC 134; 167 ALD 206 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Embertec Pty Limited v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 347 GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited [2013] FCAFC 150 Livesey v The New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Ltd v Sarb Management Group Pty Ltd (trading as Database Consultants Australia) [2013] FCA 395; 101 IPR 496 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia [2020] FCA 6; 149 IPR 370 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 447; 150 IPR 554 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (No 3) [2020] FCA 471; 151 IPR 1 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (No 4) [2020] FCA 819
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate