Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 4) [2020] FCA 1246 File number: NSD 1558 of 2012
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 27 August 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory applications made by representative applicants seeking payment of amounts from Scheme Funds and from litigation funder – some parts of one application successful and other parts failed – application for payment of further costs incurred by Scheme Administrator
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 25.14
Cases cited: Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 3) [2020] FCA 91 Caason Investments Pty Ltd v International Litigation Partners No.3 Ltd [2018] FCAFC 176; (2018) 265 FCR 487 Morad v El-Ashey (No 2) [2017] FCA 1612 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai (1997) 186 CLR 622 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 3 March 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Mr R Flory of Caason Investments Pty Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate