Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ryan on behalf of the members of the Central Limbunya, Nawurlala, Parayi-Kakaru and Tjutamalin landholding groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2020] FCA 1283 File number: NTD 1 of 2017
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2020
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – agreement of all parties – determination of native title by consent.
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 55, 56, 57, 66, 67, 68, 87, 94A, 190A, 223, 225
Cases cited: King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1386; (2011) 285 ALR 454 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Smith v State of Western Australia [2000] FCA 1249; (2000) 104 FCR 494 Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v State of Victoria [2002] HCA 58; (2002) 214 CLR 422
Division: General Division
Registry: Northern Territory
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 29
Date of hearing: 10 September 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T Ognenis
Solicitor for the Applicant: Central Land Council
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms Z Spencer
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Solicitor for the Northern Territory
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate