Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EAV16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1329 Appeal from: EAV16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 2071
File number(s): NSD 1268 of 2018
Judge(s): FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 17 September 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where the primary judge dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse the appellant a Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass XE-790) visa – principles relevant to leave to advance new grounds on appeal including a ground abandoned before the Federal Circuit Court – where Authority sent notification of referral to the wrong address through no fault of the appellant – where appellant received notice of referral of the delegate's decision to the Authority 17 days into the 21 day period for giving submissions suggested by a practice direction issued under s 473FB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether decision was made in circumstances amounting to a denial of procedural fairness, legal unreasonableness or where there was a reasonable apprehension of bias – where proposed grounds lack sufficient merit – leave refused – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5AA, 36, 46A, 473CA, 473DA-473DF, 473FA, 473FB Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27
Cases cited: AFZ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1035 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34 CRJ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1404 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; (2018) 258 FCR 551 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Ellis v R [2015] NSWCCA 262 EUW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 744 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CLV16 [2018] FCAFC 80; (2018) 260 FCR 482 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210; (2017) 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 [2018] FCAFC 32; (2018) 253 FCR 526 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541 NADH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 264 CLR 217 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; (2010) 241 CLR 252 SZNSC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1436 Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; (1994) 181 CLR 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate