Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oscar Wylee Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1340 File number: NSD 2072 of 2019
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 18 September 2020
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW — misleading or deceptive conduct and false or misleading representations — admitted contraventions — agreed penalties and other relief — whether orders sought by consent appropriate in the circumstances
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 18, 29(1)(h), 33, 224, 246 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2018) 262 CLR 157 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 4WD Systems Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 850; 200 ALR 491 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (2017) 258 FCR 312 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; 327 ALR 540; ATPR ¶42–494 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc. [1999] FCA 18; 161 ALR 79 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sontax Australia (1988) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1202; ATPR ¶42-379 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation (2018) 262 FCR 243 Australian Energy Regulator v Snowy Hydro Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 58 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd (2009) 178 FCR 485 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 269 ALR 1; 194 IR 461 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2006) 149 FCR 135 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 425 ICI Australia Operations Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 SC Johnson & Son Pty Limited v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1362 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249; ATPR ¶42–387 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2017) 258 FCR 190
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate