Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Senvion GmbH, in the matter of Senvion GmbH (No 3) [2020] FCA 1348 File number: VID 725 of 2019
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – costs application by intervener – general principle that costs follow event – whether conduct of litigation would justify different costs order – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cross-border Insolvency Act 2008 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency
Cases cited: Coombes v Registrar of Aboriginal Corporations (No 2) [2008] FCA 1078 Donald Campbell & Co v Pollack [1927] AC 732 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; 265 CLR 164; 93 ALJR 959; 372 ALR 117; 60 Fam LR 71 Senvion Gmbh, in the matter of Senvion Gmbh [2019] FCA 1124 Senvion GmbH, in the Matter of Senvion GmbH (No 2) [2019] FCA 1732; 140 ACSR 20
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 27
Date of last submissions: 22 November 2019
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate