Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The Focus Learning Group Pty Ltd v Quality Education Providers Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1349 File number: VID 492 of 2018
Judge: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application by respondents to uphold a subpoena issued to a third party - review of decision made by a Judicial Registrar to set aside subpoena – whether subpoenaed documents serve a legitimate forensic purpose – application granted in part
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law being Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 18 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 35A(5) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 3.11(2)
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 30 June 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K. Brazenor Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomson Geer Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S. Rubenstein
Solicitor for the Respondents: Piper Alderman Lawyers
ORDERS VID 492 of 2018
BETWEEN: THE FOCUS LEARNING GROUP PTY LTD ACN 128 613 427 Applicant
AND: QUALITY EDUCATION PROVIDERS PTY LTD ACN 167 868 635 First Respondent
AMANJOT SINGH Second Respondent
GURPREET SINGH AHUJA Third Respondent
JUDGE: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 2 JULY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to s 35A(5) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 3.11(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Orders made by Judicial Registrar Luxton on 27 March 2020 be set aside. 2. Pursuant to r 24.15 of the Rules, paragraph 2 of the Subpoena issued by this Court on 16 May 2019 be set aside. 3. The parties have leave to uplift, inspect and copy the documents produced by the Australian Skills and Quality Authority (ASQA) in answer to paragraph 1 of the Subpoena, such documents to be returned within 7 days of being uplifted. 4. The documents produced to the Court by ASQA in answer to paragraph 2 of the Subpoena be returned to ASQA. 5. Each party bear their own costs of and incidental to: (a) the applicant's interlocutory application filed 18 June 2019; and (b) the respondents' interlocutory application filed 17 April 2020. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate