Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taylor v Department of Health [2020] FCA 1364 File number: ACD 56 of 2019
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 24 September 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – strike out application – allegations not constituting contravention – allegations ambiguous – issue of a referral certificate or alternatively pleadings to be certified by a lawyer PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – vague and ambiguous pleadings – embarrassment – pleading of contraventions of statutory provisions PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – release from undertaking previously given
Legislation: Australian Bicentennial Authority Act 1980 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 35 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 274.2 Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 5 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 3-1 Divs 3, 5, 7, ss 336, 340, 341, 342, 346, 351, 360, 361 Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 55ZG, 55ZF Public Service Act 1999 (Cth) s 13 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.12, 16.02
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2009] FCA 510, (2009) 256 ALR 458 Banque Commerciale SA en Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FCAFC 132, (2013) 219 FCR 245 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 32, (2012) 248 CLR 500 Celand v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 222, (2017) 256 FCR 306 Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [2019] FCA 1687 Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock [2007] HCA 60, (2007) 232 CLR 245 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 50 Corporate Affairs Commission v Solomon (unreported, 1 November 1989, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal) Davis v Commonwealth (1986) 68 ALR 18 Ermel v Duluxgroup (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 17 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52, (2005) 79 ALJR 1716 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 39, (2012) 247 CLR 486 Fuller v Toms [2012] FCA 27, (2012) 247 FCR 440 Henderson v McKenzie [2009] ACTSC 39 Khiani v Australian Bureau of Statistics [2011] FCAFC 109 Klein v Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board [2012] FCA 1402, (2012) 208 FCR 178 Morton v Vouris (1996) 21 ACSR 497 Priest v New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 12 Shelton v National Roads and Motorists Association Ltd [2004] FCA 1393, (2004) 51 ACSR 278 Spiteri v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 905 Taylor v Department of Health [2019] FCA 1587 Taylor v Department of Health [2019] FCA 1588 Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2012] FCAFC 15 Thorpe v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) (1997) 71 ALJR 767 Tsilibakis v Transfield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 740 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate