Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
THC Global Group Limited, in the matter of THC Global Group Limited [2020] FCA 1371 File number: NSD 1054 of 2020
Judgment of: YATES J
Date of judgment: 22 September 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for declaratory relief under s 1322(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where plaintiff inadvertently failed to lodge a cleansing notice in respect of shares issued
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 707, 708A(5), 708A(7), 727(1), 1322(4)(a), 1322(4)(c), 1322(6)
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: 22 September 2020
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr D Sulan
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Baker McKenzie
ORDERS NSD 1054 of 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THC GLOBAL GROUP LIMITED THC GLOBABL GROUP LIMITED ACN 614 508 039 Plaintiff
order made by: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 22 SEPTEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) it is declared in respect of the 22,003,331 ordinary fully paid shares in THC Global Corporation Limited (Company) that were issued on 29 June 2020 (Placement Shares) that any offer for sale of the Placement Shares during the period 29 June 2020 until 21 September 2020 is not invalid by reason of: (a) the failure to issue a valid cleansing notice under s 708A of the Act or a prospectus as the case may be to exempt the sellers from the obligation of disclosure under the Act before selling the shares; and (b) any consequent failure by the sellers to comply with s 707(3) or s 727(1) of the Act. 2. Pursuant to s 1322(4)(c) of the Act any sellers of the Placement Shares during the period 29 June 2020 to 21 September 2020 are relieved from any civil liability arising out of any contravention of s 707(3) and s 727(1) of the Act. 3. These orders be served by the Company on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) as soon as reasonably practicable. ASIC shall include these orders on its database. 4. As soon as is reasonably practicable: (a) a copy of these orders be sent to the last known email address of each person to whom the Placement Shares were issued; and (b) the Company publish on the ASX Markets Announcement Platform an announcement with a link to these orders. 5. For a period of 28 days from the date of this order, any person who claims to have suffered substantial injustice or is likely to suffer substantial injustice by the making of any or all of these orders has liberty to apply to vary or discharge the orders. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate