Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tate v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2020] FCA 1374 File number: VID 145 of 2019
Judgment of: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 22 September 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 25 September 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – approval of discontinuance of claims against the respondent – whether proposed discontinuance is fair and reasonable – discontinuance approved
Legislation: National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Adams v Navra Group Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1157 AUB19 v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] FCA 1722 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation [2020] FCAFC 111 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Liability Trial) [2019] FCA 1244 Davaria Pty Ltd v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1234 Hodges v Waters (No 4) [2014] FCA 472 Laine v Thiess Pty Ltd; Beetson v SunWater Ltd [2016] VSC 689 Mercedes Holdings Pty Limited v Waters (No 1) [2010] FCA 124 Simonetta v Spotless Group Holdings Limited [2017] FCA 1071 Sister Marie Brigid Arthur (Litigation Representative) v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 215 Wotton v State of Queensland [2009] FCA 758
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate