Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AJE18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 1387 Appeal from: AJE18 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 3365
File number: VID 1305 of 2019
Judgment of: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 28 September 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – protection visa application based on Tamil ethnicity and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder – whether Immigration Assessment Authority failed to engage in active intellectual process – whether Authority failed to consider new information pursuant to s 473DC – whether Authority failed to reach prescribed state of satisfaction in s 473DD – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 473DC, 473DD Explanatory Memorandum to the Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014
Cases cited: AAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 114 BVC20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 565 BYA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 269 FCR 94; [2019] FCAFC 44 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352; [2017] FCAFC 107 CCQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1641 CMA19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 736 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 258 FCR 551; [2018] FCAFC 12 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 269 FCR 134; [2019] FCAFC 43 DYS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 260 FCR 260; [2018] FCAFC 33 EEM17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 265 FCR 527; [2018] FCAFC 180 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 272 FCR 409; [2019] FCA 1681 GGD18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1463 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123; [2018] HCA 34 LKQD v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1591 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 (2017) 253 FCR 475; [2017] FCAFC 21 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Haq (2019) 267 FCR 513; [2019] FCAFC 7 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2014) 231 FCR 437; [2014] FCAFC 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541; [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217; [2018] HCA 16 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 267 FCR 200; [2019] FCAFC 3 SZSLA v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 944 XFCS v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 140
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate