Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
SZRKG v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1389 Appeal from: SZRKF v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 1403
File number(s): NSD 1098 of 2018
Judgment of: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 28 September 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where primary judge dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm the decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant each of the appellants a Protection (Class XA) visa – where first ground of appeal alleges Tribunal misconstrued the relevant law relating to risk and fear of significant harm pursuant to s 36(2A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where ground not advanced before FCCA – whether expedient in the interests of justice to grant leave to advance new grounds on appeal – where no evidence of misconstruction of risk and fear of significant harm – leave refused – where second ground of appeal alleges FCCA Judge failed to consider legal and factual errors in the Tribunal decision – where ground put with high degree of generality and lack of specificity or any real particulars – where Minister concedes Tribunal erred in not assessing application of the second appellant under the family unit criterion in s 36(2)(b) by reference to both ss 36(2)(a) and 36(2)(aa) – whether error material – where all of the first appellant's material factual claims rejected – where adverse outcome inevitable if consideration given to the criterion in s 36(2)(a) – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 424AA, 424A, 438
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate