Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kovacic v A&S Powersellers Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1406 Appeal from: A&S Powerseller Pty Ltd v Kovacic [2020] FCA 459
File number: VID 305 of 2020
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – whether corporate respondent should be granted to leave to be represented by its general manager – relevant considerations – whether proceedings under sequestration order should be stayed pending determination of appeal
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 37(2), 43(2), 58(1), 153B(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 27, 28, 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 4.01
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Basetec Services Pty Ltd v CPB Contractors Pty Ltd (formerly Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd) [2017] FCA 510 Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1996] HCA 3; (1996) 134 ALR 460 Checked-Out Pty Ltd v Eagle Eye Inspections Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1002 De Robillard v Carver (2007) 159 FCR 38 Du Bray v ACW [2020] FCA 1142 Pattison v Hadjimouratis (2006) 155 FCR 226 Pharm-a-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 12) [2012] FCA 289 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65 Re Molnar Engineering Pty Ltd v Burns (1984) 3 FCR 68 Simon v Vincent J O'Gorman Pty Ltd [1979] FCA 75; (1979) 27 ALR 619
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate