Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fitzgerald v Fitzgerald [2020] FCA 1445 File number: QUD 107 of 2020
Judgment of: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file and rely upon affidavits after decision reserved – whether the affidavits are so material it is in the interests of justice to grant leave – whether the affidavits would most probably affect the result of the substantive application – application dismissed
Cases cited: Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 6
Date of hearing: 8 September 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr DR Edwards
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lilas & Loel Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C Johnstone
Solicitor for the First Respondent: McCullough Robertson Lawyers
Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents: The Second and Third Respondents did not appear
ORDERS QUD 107 of 2020
BETWEEN: MARK ANDREW FITZGERALD Applicant
AND: ROSLYN MARY FITZGERALD First Respondent
ROSLYN FITZGERALD PTY LTD (ACN 159 299 171) Second Respondent
ROSLYN FITZGERALD NO 3 PTY LTD (ACN 607 478 606) Third Respondent
order made by: REEVES J DATE OF ORDER: 8 SEPTEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate