Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
APP18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1449 Appeal from: APP18 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 3401
File number: SAD 252 of 2019
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where the Immigration Assessment Authority conducted a review of a decision to refuse to grant a visa in the exercise of its powers under Pt 7AA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the Authority identified inconsistences between two statements relied upon by the referred applicant before the original decision-maker – where the original decision-maker did not refer to one of the statements in its decision – whether the Authority failed to consider the exercise of its discretionary power to seek an explanation from the visa applicant for the inconsistencies – whether any such failure was in error – whether any such error would properly be characterised as jurisdictional
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 36, 54, 55, 56, 57, 65, 424A, 473CA, 473CB, 473DA, 473DB, 473DC, 473DD, 473DE, 473DF, 473FA, 474
Cases cited: APP18 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 3401 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; 373 ALR 196 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 269 FCR 134 FSG17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 29 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 (2017) 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate