Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DIV16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 1451 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: DIV16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 3349
File number: NSD 2359 of 2018
Judgment of: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time – applicable principles – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.03
Cases cited: CEA16 v Minister for Immigration of Border Protection [2017] FCCA 2444 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 186; (1984) 3 FCR 344
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 2 October 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: B Kaplan
Solicitor for the First Respondent: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS NSD 2359 of 2018
BETWEEN: DIV16 Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
order made by: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 9 OCTOBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for extension of time filed on 18 December 2018 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate