Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AZL20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1490 File number: WAD 537 of 2019
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 15 October 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - visa cancellation decision - where applicant failed character test - where counsel for the applicant before the Tribunal made concessions - Tribunal determined it was not bound to consider non-refoulement claims - whether Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by failing to consider non-refoulement claims as a reason to revoke visa cancellation decision - whether Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by assuming that non-refoulement obligations would be considered in separate application for protection visa - whether Tribunal needed to consider representations concerning non-refoulement regardless of concession made by counsel - Tribunal correct to rely on concessions so as to proceed on the basis that no non-refoulement claim was before it - non-refoulement claim not substantial and clearly articulated - Tribunal otherwise gave representations appropriate consideration - no jurisdictional error found - application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43C, 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 476A, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Ahmed v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 557 AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1423 Comcare v Fiedler [2001] FCA 1810; (2001) 115 FCR 328 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 89; (2019) 270 FCR 12 Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 35 ALR 186 Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1473; (2015) 237 FCR 516 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Le [2016] FCAFC 120; (2016) 244 FCR 56 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; (2013) 212 FCR 99 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 Omar v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 279 Repatriation Commission v Warren [2008] FCAFC 64; (2008) 167 FCR 511 Sami v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 106 Sowa v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 111; (2019) 369 ALR 389 Toia v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 79; (2009) 177 FCR 125 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate