Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as The Australian Manufacturing Union (AMWU) v BR & I Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1498 File number: NSD 1939 of 2019
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discovery under r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether reasonable inquiries have been made – whether the documents sought are necessary to decide whether to commence proceedings – where prospective respondent opposes order – held: application allowed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 7.23 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 545, 539, 45, 183, 186, 186(2)(a), 188 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: CFMEU v One Key Workforce [2018] FCAFC 77; (2018) 262 FCR 527 CFMEU v One Key Workforce Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1266 Fox v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2007] FCAFC 150 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 1360; (2004) 211 ALR 147 Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1584; (1999) 96 FCR 1 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis Au Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193; (2017) 257 FCR 62 Matrix Film Investment One Pty Limited v Alameda Films LLC [2006] FCA 591 Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Ltd [2005] FCA 801; (2005) 223 ALR 238 McFarlane as Trustee for the S McFarlane Superannuation Fund v IOOF Holdings Limited [2018] FCA 692 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 133; (2008) 169 FCR 435
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate