Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Singh v Sydney Trains [2020] FCA 1521 File number: NSD 691 of 2020
Judgment of: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2020
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – unfair dismissal – whether Fair Work Commission properly exercised its jurisdiction –whether Commission took into account whether dismissal was for a valid reason – whether Commission took into account other matters it considered relevant – whether Commission engaged with the gist of the submissions made
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 381, 385, 387, 575, 576, 577, 578, 591, 593, 596, 601 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Competition Policy and Consumer Affairs v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd [2009] FCAFC 105, (2009) 179 FCR 323 Byrne and Frew v Australian Airlines (1995) 185 CLR 410 Linfox Australia Pty Ltd v Fair Work Commission [2013] FCAFC 157, (2013) 240 IR 178 Singh v Sydney Trains [2019] FWC 182 Singh v Sydney Trains [2019] FWC 6620 Singh v Sydney Trains [2020] FWCFB 884 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 177, (2017) 246 FCR 146
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 76
Date of last submission/s: 24 September 2020
Date of hearing: 13 August and 21 September 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate