Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lamont v Malishus Limited [2020] FCA 1535 File number: NSD 33 of 2020
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 21 October 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for substituted service of initiating documents – where respondent resides in New Zealand – application of the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) – where respondent has refused to accept personal service as required by the Act – application of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) relating to substituted service – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.24, r 36.06 Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) s 9
Cases cited: Webster v Brewer [2020] FCA 622
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 15 October 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms. Cairns with Ms A. Reid (for the application for an extension of time) The Applicant appeared in person (for the interlocutory application)
Counsel for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Mr I. Horak with Ms L. Davis (for the application for an extension of time) The First, Second and Third Respondents did not appear (for the interlocutory application)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate