Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
EEU20 v Meat Industry Employees' Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd (Trustee) (No 2) [2020] FCA 1536 File number: VID 946 of 2019
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – application by successful parties for costs against respondent tribunal and trustee – where both respondents filed submitting notices save as to costs – discussion of purpose and effect of submitting notices – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) s 46 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 12.01
Cases cited: Bullivant v Australian Meat Industry Superannuation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1588 Choice Pharmacy Vincentia Pty Ltd v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 2) [2020] FCA 363 Develtor Property Group Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council [2001] NSWLEC 47 EEU20 v Meat Industry Employees' Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd (Trustee) [2020] FCA 1359 Highland v Labraga (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 871 Madsen v Power (No 2) [2010] FCA 686 Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (No 3) (1987) 77 ALR 609 Pham v Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal [2016] VSCA 135 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13; 144 CLR 13
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate