Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yeo, in the matter of Bradi Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) v Sklenovski (No 2) [2020] FCA 1541 File number(s): VID 102 of 2020
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 22 October 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing order over assets of second defendant – consideration of factors relevant to making freezing orders – previous conduct of second defendant relevant – certain caveat removed – real property of second defendant newly exposed Held: interim freezing orders granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.32, 7.35, 41.10
Cases cited: Basi v Namitha Nakul Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 743 Yeo, in the matter of Bradi Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) v Sklenovski [2020] FCA 1540
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 19 October 2020
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Andrew Silver
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Victoria)
ORDERS VID 102 of 2020 IN THE MATTER OF BRADI TRANSPORT PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 073 124 928)
BETWEEN: ANDREW REGINALD YEO AND GESS RAMBALDI (IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF BRADI TRANSPORT PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 073 124 928) First and Second Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate