Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1542 File number: NSD 2289 of 2018
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 23 October 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application challenging claims for legal professional privilege – where privilege claims of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ('ACCC') upheld – where ACCC sought order that costs should follow the event – where party challenging the privilege claims sought no order as to costs – ordinary rule that a successful party in litigation is entitled to an award of costs in its favour – ordinary rule subject to certain limited exceptions – whether ordinary rule should apply
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 45
Cases cited: Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphod Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1232 Cellarit Pty Ltd v Cawarrah Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 266 Commissioner of Taxation v AusNet Transmission Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 124 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 247 FCR 61 Moseley v AB (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1812 Northern Territory v Sangare (2019) 265 CLR 164 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Tomanovic v Global Mortgage Equity Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 256; 288 ALR 385
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate