Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Henderson on behalf of the Bamayu (Wurwanawanji–Yarrayarra), Bamayu (Titirlku), Marlinja, Ngapa Jangirulu, Walanypirri and Wilyuku Groups v Northern Territory of Australia (Powell Creek Pastoral Lease Proceeding) [2020] FCA 1550 File number: NTD 1 of 2018
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 28 October 2020
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – requirements under ss 87 and 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – agreement of all parties – determination of native title by consent.
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 29, 57, 66, 67, 68, 87, 87A, 94A, 223, 225
Cases cited: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Freddie v Northern Territory [2017] FCA 867 King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1386; (2011) 285 ALR 454 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v State of Victoria [2002] HCA 58; (2002) 214 CLR 422 Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229l; (2001) 115 FCR 109
Division: General Division
Registry: Northern Territory
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 42
Date of hearing: 28 October 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate