Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Dispute Resolution Associates Pty Ltd v Selth (No 3) [2020] FCA 1554 Appeal from: Minus v Selth (No 2) [2017] FCA 1233
File number: NSD 1409 of 2018
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 23 October 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for extension of time and leave to appeal – whether costs should follow the event.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Northern Territory v Sangare (2019) 265 CLR 164; [2019] HCA 25 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Umoona Tjutagku Health Service Aboriginal Corporation v Walsh (2019) 268 FCR 401; [2019] FCAFC 32
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 23 October 2020
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D Minus
Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent did not appear
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Mr T Bridges of Webb Henderson
ORDERS NSD 1409 of 2018
BETWEEN: DISPUTE RESOLUTION ASSOCIATES PTY LTD ACN 50 090 594 451 First Applicant
MEDIATION & ARBITRATION CENTRE PTY LTD ACN 608 133 768 Second Applicant
AND: PHILIP SELTH IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION First Respondent
ABA AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION LTD ACN 605 949 148 Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate