Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Manolo Blahnik Worldwide Limited v Estro Concept Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1561 File number: NSD 609 of 2020
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 29 October 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.22 and r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether prospective applicant has sufficient information to decide whether to commence a proceeding against prospective respondent – application allowed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, ss 18, 29 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), s 120 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth), r O 15A r 6 (repealed) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.22, 7.23
Cases cited: BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v Corelogic Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1556 Bonham v Iluka Resources Ltd (2017) 252 FCR 58 Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Ltd (2015) 245 FCR 129 E D Oates Pty Ltd v Edgar Edmondson Imports [2012] FCA 607 Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1 McFarlane as Trustee for the S McFarlane Superannuation Fund v IOOF Holdings Limited [2018] FCA 692 ObjectiVision Pty Ltd v Visionsearch Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1087 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd (2017) 257 FCR 62 Quanta Software International Pty Ltd v Computer Management Services Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 969; (2000) 175 ALR 536 Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate