Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Google LLC [2020] FCA 1563 File number: NSD 1760 of 2019
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discovery of 58 "categories" – whether categories were directly relevant within the meaning of r 20.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – consideration of delay in bringing application – discovery of some categories ordered
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.11, 20.13, 20.14, 20.15
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd t/as Bet365 [2015] FCA 1007 Baxter v British Airways PLC (1988) 82 ALR 298 Bridge Stockbrokers Ltd v Bridges (1984) 4 FCR 460 Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 321 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1985) 10 FCR 567 Telstra Corp Ltd v Phone Directories Co Pty Ltd (2014) 316 ALR 590 Unilever Australia Ltd v Goodman Fielder Consumer Foods Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1305
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Number of paragraphs: 64
Date of hearing: 14 October 2020
Counsel for the Applicant: K Richardson SC with A d'Arville
Solicitor for the Applicant: Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
Counsel for the Respondents: R Yezerski with S Hartford Davis
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate