Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Muto v Janover [2020] FCA 1579 Appeal from: Janover v Muto [2020] FCCA 1351
File number(s): VID 424 of 2020
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 28 October 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 30 October 2020
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – sole ground of appeal – whether primary judge erred by not allowing the appellant to have legal assistance or a legal guardian in the Federal Circuit Court – necessary for appellant to demonstrate error in the primary judge's findings or conclusion – no error demonstrated – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Div 2 of Pt III
Cases cited: Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Janover v Muto [2020] FCCA 1351 Lee v Lee [2019] HCA 28 Robinson Helicopter Co Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: 28 October 2020
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent appeared in person
ORDERS VID 424 of 2020
BETWEEN: MILVAN MUTO Appellant
AND: LEWIS JANOVER Respondent
order made by: ANDERSON J DATE OF ORDER: 28 OCTOBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate