Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. [2020] FCA 1638 Appeal from: Saje v Union For Progressive Judaism Inc and Ors (No 4) [2020] FCCA 341 Saje v Union For Progressive Judaism Inc and Ors (No 3) [2020] FCCA 340 Saje v Union For Progressive Judaism Inc and Ors (No 2) [2020] FCCA 339
File number: WAD 45 of 2020
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – proceedings dismissed before final hearing – where appellant is unable to continue the proceeding – whether it is appropriate to award costs on a lump sum basis
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PH(1)(c), 46PO Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25(2B)(aa), 31A(2), 37M(1), 40.02, 43(3)(d) Sexual Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) ss 22, 94 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 26.01, 26.12(7), 36.03
Cases cited: Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 506 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 LFDB v SM (No 4) [2017] FCA 753 Purvis v New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92; [2003] HCA 62 Royal v El Ali (No 3) [2016] FCA 1573 Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc & Ors [2019] FCCA 847
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 40
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate