Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Opticomm Limited, in the matter of Opticomm Limited [2020] FCA 1679 File number(s): VID 405 of 2020
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 12 November 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 19 November 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – second court hearing – application for approval of scheme of arrangement – application allowed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 2J.3, ss 260A, 411, 412(1)
Cases cited: Lion Nathan Limited, in the matter of Lion Nathan Limited (No. 2) [2009] FCA 1261 Re Amcor (No 2) [2019] FCA 842 Re Anaconda Nickel Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] WASC 19 Re Bond Corp Holdings Ltd (1991) 5 ACSR 304 Re Central Pacific Minerals NL [2002] FCA 239 Re Coles Group Ltd (No 2) [2007] VSC 523 Re Hudson Conway Ltd [2000] VSC 21 Re NRMA (No 2) [2000] NSWSC 408 Re Seven Network Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 400 Re Wesfarmers Ltd; Ex Parte Wesfarmers Ltd [No 2] [2018] WASC 357
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate