Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
McVeigh v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1698 File number: NSD 1333 of 2018
Judgment of: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – non-party request for access to restricted document on Court file – whether access to Applicant's submissions should be granted where matter settled prior to hearing
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32
Cases cited: Baptist Union of Queensland – Carinity v Roberts [2015] FCA 1068; 241 FCR 135 Castle v United States [2018] FCA 1079 Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 1) [2014] FCA 1232 Macquarie Radio Network Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Authority [2002] FCA 1408 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Egan [2018] FCA 1320 Oldham v Capgemini Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1101 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 9) [2005] FCA 1394; 148 FCR 1
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 6
Date of last submissions: 18 November 2020 (Applicant) 17 November 2020 (Respondent)
Date of hearing: The application was considered in Chambers
Solicitor for the Applicant: Equity Generation Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
ORDERS NSD 1333 of 2018
BETWEEN: MARK MCVEIGH Applicant
AND: RETAIL EMPLOYEES SUPERANNUATION PTY LTD ACN 001 987 739 Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate