Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Clover Corporation Limited v Tobias (No 2) [2020] FCA 1710 File number(s): VID 1265 of 2019
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – search order – where applicants' solicitors inspected certain seized documents in redacted form – whether applicants' solicitors should be granted leave to inspect unredacted versions of those documents and others – where further pleadings contemplated and no application made for discovery
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 7.42
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1707 Brooks Sports, Inc v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1000 Bucyrus (Australia) Pty Ltd v ANI Mining Services Ltd [1999] FCA 1193; 45 IPR 643 Clover Corporation Limited v Tobias [2020] FCA 1244 Findex Group Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1567 Findex Group Ltd v McKay [2019] NSWCA 93 Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v Bega Cheese Limited (No 3) [2018] FCA 1023 Lamond (No 4) [2017] FCA 820 Metso Minerals (Australia) Ltd v Kalra (No 3) [2008] FCA 1201 Metso Minerals (Australia) Ltd v Kalra [2009] FCAFC 57 Microsoft Corporation v Goodview Electronics Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 754; 46 IPR 159 Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Guina Developments Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 34 Rauland Australia Pty Ltd v Johnson (No 2) [2019] FCA 1175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate