Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v The Country Care Group Pty Ltd (Ruling No 2) [2020] FCA 1713 File number: VID 224 of 2019
Ruling of: BROMWICH J
Date of ruling: 18 November 2020
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – objections to evidence being given by prosecution witnesses in relation to, or that is indicative of, the value of the rehabilitation aid supply industry or its participants, and the share of that industry held by the first accused, on the basis that they are opinions other than lay opinions, that they lack relevance, and that their probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice – objections rejected
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 76, 78, 79, 137
Cases cited: Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303; 316 ALR 206 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR 593 Gilbert v The Queen [2000] HCA 15; 201 CLR 414 Lodhi v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 360; 179 A Crim R 470 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; 56 NSWLR 182
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Federal Crime and Related Proceedings
Number of paragraphs: 23
Date of hearing: 15 March 2021 - 1 June 2021
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate