Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lusty v CRA20 [2020] FCA 1737 File number: NSD 653 of 2020
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 3 December 2020
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – sentencing – contempt of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission – contempt punishable as contempt of Federal Court – respondent in contempt by refusing to answer questions in examination – where respondent pleaded guilty – where respondent did not subsequently purge contempts despite opportunities to do so – where summons no longer extant - fixed term of imprisonment imposed
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 7, 7C, 20, 21, 22, 28, 30, 34A, 34B, 46B Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Special Operation Authorisation and Determination (High Risk and Emerging Drugs No. 4) 2018 Criminal Code (Cth) Part 9.1, Division 400 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Part 42
Cases cited: Allbeury v Corruption and Crime Commission [2012] WASCA 84; (2012) 42 WAR 425 Anderson v BYF19 [2019] FCA 1959 Anderson v DKH18 [2018] FCA 1571 Anderson v DKH18 (No 2) [2019] FCA 1352 Anderson v GPY18 [2019] FCA 954 Anderson v XLVII [2015] FCA 19 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Info4pc.com Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 949; (2002) 121 FCR 24 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 6) [2012] FCA 809 Corruption and Crime Commission v Allbeury et al (No 2) [2011] WASC 26; (2011) 205 A Crim R 386 Hannaford v HH [2010] FCA 1214; (2010) 205 A Crim R 366 Hannaford v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560; (2012) 203 FCR 501 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hughes v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 319; (2004) 247 FCR 277 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCAFC 111; (2017) 256 FCR 90 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 83; (2006) 149 FCR 494 R v Drever [2010] SASCFC 27 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550 Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc [2011] FCAFC 17; (2011) 276 ALR 596 Von Doussa v Owens (No 3) (1982) 31 SASR 116 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Wood v Galea [1995] NSWSC 100; (1995) 79 A Crim R 567 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate