Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Marco (No 6) [2020] FCA 1781 File number: WAD 481 of 2018
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 11 December 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – managed investment scheme – winding up – whether scheme amounted to managed investment scheme required to be registered under s 601ED(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where the personal defendant executed declarations of trust with investors and pooled funds in personal bank accounts – where personal defendant used funds to participate in 'private placement programmes' – where personal defendant transferred funds to the corporate defendant to purchase real property and vintage cars – whether the conduct of both defendants constituted the operation of a managed investment scheme – in circumstances where the personal defendant considered the corporate defendant to be an extension of his business dealings CORPORATIONS – financial services business – whether the defendants carried on a financial services business – whether the defendants breached s 911A of the Corporations Act by not holding an Australian Financial Services License – whether the personal defendant was dealing in a financial product – whether the corporate defendants' holding of property assets formed part of the financial services business CORPORATIONS – final relief – winding up orders – contraventions of Ch 5C and Ch 7 of the Corporations Act – whether it is just and equitable that the scheme and the corporate defendant be wound up – whether receivers should be appointed on a final basis concurrently with liquidators – where receivers are necessary for identification and delivery up of scheme property CORPORATIONS – final relief – declarations – whether there is sufficient evidence to support the declarations sought CORPORATIONS – final relief – injunctions – where injunctions would expose the personal defendant to contempt of court for further contraventions – whether exposure to contempt of court for future contraventions is appropriate given the deliberateness and seriousness of the contraventions CORPORATIONS – receivers – administrators – liquidators – where the corporate defendant is placed in voluntary administration by the personal defendant after the filing of the application for winding up – where the creditors of the corporate defendant resolve that it be wound up after the final hearing of the winding up application – where interim receivers were appointed to the whole scheme six months ago – whether the interim receivers should replace the voluntary administrators as liquidators of the corporate defendant – orders under s 467B of the Corporations Act – in circumstances where the appointment of a single insolvency practitioner to the whole scheme will save time and expense in the winding up
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate