Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Cumaiyi v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1804 File number: NTD 36 of 2019
Judgment of: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – award of costs in respect of an application for strike out pleadings on which the respondents were partly successful. DISCOVERY – dispute as to the categories of documents to be discovered under rr 20.14 and 20.15 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – order made.
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 494AA(1)(c) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) of s 9 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 16.21, 20.11, 20.12, 20.14, 20.15
Cases cited: Cumaiyi v Northern Territory of Australia [2020] FCA 1299 DBE17 v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2018] FCA 1793 Featherstone v Peninsula Health (No 2) [2004] FCA 594; (2004) 137 FCR 262 Finnegan v Washington (No 3) [2020] FCA 1654 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 96 Mentink v Minister for Justice [2016] FCA 432
Division: General Division
Registry: Northern Territory
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 46
Date of last submissions: 2 December 2020
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate