Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2020] FCA 1811 Related reasons: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1982
File number: NSD 453 of 2016
Judgment of: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2020
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – Adjudication of how Court should determine whether enrolment by the respondent of a consumer in an online course was the result of the unconscionable system of conduct or pattern of behaviour found to have existed in liability judgment (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1982)
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 21, 237, 239 Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth) s 2-1, sch 1A cl 46AA Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 87
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1982 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2019] FCA 1544 Awad v Twin Creeks Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 200 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Domain Register Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 2008 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 41; 210 CLR 109
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate