Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sesalim v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2020] FCA 1815 Appeal from: Sisalem and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2020] AATA 11 (8 January 2020)
File number: VID 81 of 2020
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2020
Catchwords: SOCIAL SECURITY – disability support pension – appeal on a question of law from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Tribunal concluded that the applicant was not entitled to a disability support pension at the relevant date – whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence – whether the Tribunal misinterpreted the relevant statute – whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), ss 23, 26, 94, 1213, 1218AAA Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth), s 80 Social Security (Tables for the Assessment of Work-related Impairment for Disability Support Pension) Determination 2011 (Cth), ss 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11
Cases cited: Applicant 0108 v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2017] FCA 535 Board of Trustees of the State Public Sector Superannuation Scheme v Edington (2011) 119 ALD 472 Prahauser v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2020] FCA 1658 Sesalim v Secretary, Department of Social Services (2018) 75 AAR 476; [2018] FCA 1159 Sesalim v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2018] FCA 1401
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate