Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CHP16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1818 Appeal from: CHP16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 367
File number: VID 190 of 2020
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision not to grant appellant a protection visa – principles relevant to leave to raise fresh grounds of appeal – whether Tribunal erred by relying upon outdated or superseded country information – whether Tribunal had an unqualified obligation to search out more recent country information – whether the Tribunal misapplied the "real chance" test in deciding that the appellant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution – whether the Tribunal misconstrued and constructively failed to consider a letter of support relied upon by the appellant – whether a claim or integer of a claim that the appellant feared that he would suffer harm from anti-Shia militants when travelling on the roads clearly emerged from the materials before the Tribunal – whether Tribunal overlooked or failed to deal with essential integer of appellant's claim – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 65, 499(1)
Cases cited: AKH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 47; (2019) 269 FCR 168 Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 174; (2016) 250 FCR 109 ARK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 825 AWT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 512 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 89; (2018) 261 FCR 503 BMP15 v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCA 1291 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 46; (2019) 268 FCR 362 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1323 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 CPE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 591 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 Hossain v Minster for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 233 FCR 136 Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner [2015] FCAFC 20; (2015) 317 ALR 665 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs & Another v Peko-Wallsend Ltd & Others (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Another v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB [2013] FCAFC 33; (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Murad v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 73; (2017) 250 FCR 510 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 134 O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 SZJTQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1938; (2008) 172 FCR 563 SZQBN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 686; (2014) 226 FCR 68 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate