Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) [2020] FCA 1824 File number: VID 1277 of 2017
Judgment of: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Amendment – Application for leave to file Second Further Amended Originating Process and Points of Claim – Application for leave to file further amended Concise Statements – Whether substantially different case PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Multiple respondents – Whether common issues exist in relation to all respondents — Applications to remove respondents from proceedings PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Whether costs thrown away – Whether costs thrown away should be taxed and paid forthwith – Whether costs thrown away should be paid on an indemnity basis COURTS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM – Cross-vesting – Whether proceedings ought to be transferred to Supreme Court of New South Wales – Accrued jurisdiction of Federal Court of Australia
Legislation: Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (Qld) Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (Qld)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate