Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1835 File number(s): VID 1408 of 2016
Judgment of: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be apportioned to account for parties' respective success on issues – 5% reduction of respondents' costs of infringement claim – no apportionment of cross-claim – Calderbank offer – whether respondent entitled to indemnity costs – no order for indemnity costs – whether costs should be ordered on a lump-sum basis – costs ordered on a lump sum basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 ss 35A and 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 3.01; Sch 2
Cases cited: Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCAFC 231 Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 881 BlueScope Steel Limited v Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 113 Carey v Freehills [2013] FCA 1258 Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) (No 6) [2020] FCA 1001 DSI Australia (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Garford Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 268 Firebird Global Master Fund II v Republic of Nauru (No 2) [2015] HCA 53; 327 ALR 192; 90 ALJR 270 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) v Generic Partners Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 100 GM Global Technology Operations LLC v S.S.S. Auto Parts Pty Ltd (No 2) (Costs) [2019] FCA 1813 Kiefel v State of Victoria [2014] FCA 411 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27; 247 FCR 61 Mylan Health Pty Ltd (formerly BGP Products Pty Ltd) v Sun Pharma ANZ Pty Ltd (formerly Ranbaxy Australia Pty Ltd) (No 2) [2019] FCA 883 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 403 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; 115 FCR 229 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Quarry Mining & Construction Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 158 Sealed Air Australia Pty Limited v Aus-Lid Enterprises Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 388 Umoona Tjutagku Health Service Aboriginal Corporation v Walsh [2019] FCAFC 32; 268 FCR 401
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate