Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Gill v Ethicon Sárl (No 9) [2020] FCA 1838 File number: NSD 1590 of 2012
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for stay of lump sum costs order pending appeal
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (receivers appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 548 Flight Centre Limited v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 658 Gill v Ethicon Sárl (No 8) [2020] FCA 771 Henderson v Amadio Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 66 Fair Work Ombudsman v Priority Matters Ltd [2016] FCA 1415 Urban Alley Brewery Pty Ltd v La Sirène Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 351
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of hearing: 18 December 2020
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr AJL Bannon SC with Ms Z Hillman
Solicitor for the Applicants: Shine Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr DTW Wong
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 1590 of 2012
BETWEEN: KATHRYN GILL First Applicant
DIANE DAWSON Second Applicant
ANN SANDERS Third Applicant
AND: ETHICON SÁRL First Respondent
ETHICON, INC. Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate