Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Village Roadshow Limited, in the matter of Village Roadshow Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1857 File number: VID 597 of 2020
Judgment of: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 23 December 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – scheme of arrangement – second court hearing – application under ss 411(4)(b) and 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for approval of scheme of arrangement – procedural irregularity – no substantial injustice – scheme approved
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: In re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas & Pacific Junction Railway Co [1891] 1 Ch 213 Re Amcor Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 842 Re APN Outdoor Group Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1633 Re Billabong International Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 496 Re Gindalbie Metals Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1066 Re Metals Exploration Ltd [2007] FCA 84 Re OneVue Holdings Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1427 Re Onevue Holdings Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1584 Re Opus Group Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1413 Re Sienna Cancer Diagnostics Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1088 Re SRG Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1424 Re TriAusMin Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 833 Village Roadshow Limited, in the matter of Village Roadshow Limited [2020] FCA 1669
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate