Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Heenan (Receiver), in the matter of Ruby Apartments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Ralan Paradise No. 1 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] FCA 1878 File number: QUD 159 of 2020
Judgment of: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for orders deeming service of originating documents under rr 10.23 and 10.48 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where there are 240 named defendants – where at least some of the defendants reside in the People's Republic of China – whether it is not practicable to effect personal service on the relevant defendants – whether it can be inferred, on the balance of probabilities, that the originating documents have been brought to the attention of the relevant defendants
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Safety Compliance Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2016] FCA 303 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v China Environment Group Ltd [2013] FCA 286 British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v Taleb (No 1) [2012] FCA 1065 Commissioner of Taxation v Caratti (No 2) [2018] FCA 1500 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Zeitouni (2013) 306 ALR 603; [2013] FCA 1011 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2007] FCA 124 Ross v Cotter [2015] FCA 310 Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd v Tarrant [2011] FCA 1067
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate