Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ozmen v Culture Map Pty Ltd (No 1) [2020] FCA 1890 File number(s): NSD 2423 of 2018
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 11 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for recusal – whether a fair-minded lay observer might perceive judge might not bring an impartial mind to resolution of issues – Held: application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 237 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37N
Cases cited: Adacot and Sowle [2020] FamCAFC 215 Almeida v Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd [2006] UKPC 44 Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 British America Tobacco Australian Services Limited v Laurie (2011) 242 CLR 283 Cabcharge Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 111 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 IOOF Australia Trustees Ltd v SEAS Sapfor Forests Pty Ltd (1999) 78 SASR 151 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Michael Wilson Partners & Partners v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427 Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd v Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd (2020) 375 ALR 489 Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Limited (2019) 369 ALR 644 Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd (No 5) [2019] FCA 904 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Re Keely; Ex parte Ansett Transport Industries (1990) 94 ALR 1 The Queen v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate