Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ozmen v Culture Map Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1891 File number(s): NSD 2423 of 2018
Judgment of: RARES J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for security for costs pursuant to s 56 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 19.01 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – Held: application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 237 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37N, 56 Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 19.01
Cases cited: Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 Commission of Taxation (Cth) v Vasiliades (2016) 344 ALR 558 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 75 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189 Morris v Hanley [2001] NSWCA 374 Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd v Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd (2020) 375 ALR 489 Ninan v St George Bank Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 190 at 199 [35] Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd (2019) 369 ALR 644 Ozmen v Culture Map Pty Ltd (No 1) [2020] FCA 1890 PS Chellaram & Co Ltd v China Ocean Shipping Co (1991) 102 ALR 321 Tyne (as trustee of Argot Trust) v UBS AG (2014) 102 ACSR 403
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate